Case Law › High Court › Rp/100152/2017 Of The Commissioner Of In...

Rp/100152/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Sri. Mallikarjun

High Court 22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karhcdharwad

Parties

Date of order

22 Jan 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/100152/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Sri. Mallikarjun, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018) PRESENT THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA R.P. NO.100152/2017 BETWEEN: 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)& FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEXOPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITALDR. B.R. AMBBDKAR ROAD& FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEXOPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITALDR. B.R. AMBBDKAR ROAD BBLAGAVI 590 OO] 2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1(1)WARD NO.1(1) OPPOSITEK TO CIVIL HOSPITAL DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BBLAGAVI- 590 OO] _. PRHTITIONBRS. (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) ANT) SRI MALLIKARJUN CO-OPBRATIVE|CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,JUGAL, TALUK ATHANI, BELAGAVIREPRESHNIED BY ITS SKHCREIARYRUDRAGOUDA RAMAGOUDA PATILAGED ABOUT 42 YEARSOCC: SERVICE, R/O JUGAL, TALUK ATHANTL,DISTRICT BELAGAVI-591304. .. RESPONDENT THIS PRTITION IS FILED UNDER SBCTION XLVII RULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN LT.A. NO.100039/2014 ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J.,MADEB THR FOLLOWING: ORDER In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd. oDIt is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 6089 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected. © 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. sd/-.JUDGE| CLK od/-|JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.