Rp/100153/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Basaveshwar Co-Operative
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100153/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Basaveshwar Co-Operative
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100153/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Basaveshwar Co-Operative, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100153/2017
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BBRLAGAVI-59000 1DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1, NIPPANI,
BELAGAVI, KARNATAKA.
—. PRHTITIONBRS
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND
SHRI BASAVBSHWAR CO-OPBRATIVE|
CREDIT SOCIETY LID.,.
SOMAWAR PETH, CHIKODI-590002,BBLAGAVI DISTRICT.
_ RESPONDENT
THIS PRTITION IS FILED UNDER SBCTION XLVII RULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015)PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ILT.A. NO.100091/2014 ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|
with an inordinate delay of 692 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected. ©
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
sd/-.JUDGE|
CLK
od/-)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue