Rp/100154/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Brahmanath Co-Operative Society Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100154/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Brahmanath Co-Operative Society Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100154/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shree Brahmanath Co-Operative Society Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.1001594/201
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)' FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,|OPPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,' FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,|OPPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD NO.1(1),.WARD NO.1(1),.
OPPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
_. PRHTITIONBRS.
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
ANTSHREE BRAHMANATH CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD.,.KAGWAD, TQ: ATHANI, DIST: BELGAVI,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,RAJENDRA BALASAHEB KHOT,AGE: 90 YEARS, OCC: SERVICE, R/O: KAGWAD, TQ: ATHANI-591304,DIST: BELGAVI.
... RESPONDEN
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECITION XLVIL RULE 1OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN I.T.A. NO.100037/2014 ON.
7 OD 3
THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J..MADEB THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|
with an inordinate delay of 688 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
od/-|
JUDGE|
CLK
sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue