Rp/100159/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nagaraj Basappa Goranal
High Court
10 Jun 2016 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100159/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nagaraj Basappa Goranal
Date of order
10 Jun 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100159/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Nagaraj Basappa Goranal, the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FORORDERS,THIS.DAY,THE.COURTMADE||THFOLLOWING: - ORDER Memo filed by the learned advocate for the petitionen is placed on record and petition is dismissed as havingbecome infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 10 DAY OF JUNE, 2016
BEFORE
THE HON’‘’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.N.VENUGOPALA GOWREVIEW PETITION NO.100159/2014
BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXOPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD,BELGAUM.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICERWARD-I, BAGALKOT.PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
NAGARAJ BASAPPA GORANALA/P: BISANAL,SO: GALAGALITQ: BILAGI,DIST: BAGALKOT.RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 4/RULE 1 OF CPC., PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED09.07.2014 PASSED IN THE WP.NO.105402/2014(T-IT)ON THE FILE OF HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWADBENCH.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FORORDERS,THIS.DAY,THE.COURTMADE||THFOLLOWING: -
ORDER
Memo filed by the learned advocate for the petitionen
is placed on record and petition is dismissed as havingbecome infructuous.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sub/
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.