Rp/100159/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100159/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100159/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri. Bramhanath Credit Souhard Sahakari Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100159/2017
BETWEHEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBLAGAVI.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1,
NIPPANI-59000 1.
... PRTTTIONBR
(BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND:
1.SHRI. BRAMHANATH CREDIT SOUHARD
SAHAKARI LTD.,
CHIKKODI ROAD, NIPPANI,BELAGAVI DISTRICI.BELAGAVI DISTRICI.
... RESPONDEN
THIS PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1OF CPC PRAYING TO RBVIEW THR ORDER DATED|21.09.2015 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN No.100073/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 712 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
od/-|JUDGE|
JTR
sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue