Case LawHigh Court › Rp/100161/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Inc...

Rp/100161/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Durduneshwar Urban

High Court 22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100161/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Durduneshwar Urban
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/100161/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Durduneshwar Urban, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH DATBD THIS THER 2 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018) PRESENT THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA ANT) THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHAEL CUNHA| R.P. NO.100161/2017 BBRIWHEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),BBRLAGAVI-59000 1BBRLAGAVI-59000 1 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD NO.1(3),NIPPANI-590001_NIPPANI-590001_ ... PRTTTIONBR (BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANTI) 1.SHRI. DURDUNBSWAR URBANCO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SANKESHWARA, TALUK:HUKKERI,DIST:BELAGAVI,REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,SRI. AMAR JIRALIT,AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,SANKESHWARA, TALUK:HUKKERI,DIST:BELAGAVI,REP. BY ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER,SRI. AMAR JIRALIT,AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, »/O SHRI. MALLIKARJUNA. ... RESPONDEN THIS PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1OF CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THRE ORDER DATED21.09.2015 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN NO.100017/2015, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD. 7 OD 3 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING: ORDER In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd. 2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 712 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected. 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. od/-|JUDGE| JTR sd/-.JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan