Rp/100164/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Laxmibai Hanamanth Torvi
High Court
27 Feb 2015 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100164/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Laxmibai Hanamanth Torvi
Date of order
27 Feb 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rp/100164/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Laxmibai Hanamanth Torvi, the High Court (2015) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2015
BHEFOR
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE ALIN.VENUGOPALA GOWDREVIEW PEIITION No.100164 OF 2014
BEREITI$
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXOPP CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR.B.R.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELGAUM.
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,WARD-I, BAGALKOT,— PRTITIONERS(BY SRL Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
LAXMIBAI HANAMANTH TORVI@ HEBBALATTI, A/P: BISANAL,SO: GALAGALITTQ: BILAGI, DIST: BAGALKOT.~~ RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. HAR.KAMBIYAVAR, ADV.)
THIS REVIEW PEIITION IS FILED UNDERORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEWTHR ORDER DTD: 09.07.2014 PASSED IN THEW.P.NO.105404/2014 (T-IT) ON THE FILE OF THEHON ’BLEHIGHCOURT|QO)KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH.
THIS REVIEW PERTITION COMING ON FOORDERS, LHIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THEFOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri.H.R.Kambiyavar,learnedadvocate,
volunteered to accept notice on behalf of respondent,
2. Sri.Y.V.Raviraj, learned advocate for thepetitioners, submitted that this petition has becomeinfructuous, in view of the refund granted by petitionerNo.2, pursuant to the direction issued, in the ordersought to be reviewed herein 1.e., passed on the originalside—writ petition.
Recording the submission of Sri.Y.V.Raviraj, the
petition 1sdisposed of,having becomeinfructuous
RK/-Ct: byg/-
SD/-
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.