Case LawHigh Court › Rp/100166/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Inc...

Rp/100166/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Kalika Daivadnya Co-Operative Credit Society

High Court 22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100166/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Kalika Daivadnya Co-Operative Credit Society
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/100166/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Kalika Daivadnya Co-Operative Credit Society, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH. DATBRD THIS THER DAY OF JANUARY, 2018PRESENT THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND. THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA| R.P. NO.100166/2017 BBRIWEEN 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)& FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,|OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROALD& FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,|OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR ROALD BBRLAGAVI-59000 1 2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1(1),.WARD NO.1(1),. OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-590 OO1.. _. PRHTITIONBRS. (BY SRI: Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE, ANT) SHRI KALIKA DAIVADNYACO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., —1843/44, BAPAT GALLI, BELGAVI,REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY,SHRI MANGBSH SHASHIKANT SHRODKARAGE MAJOR, OCC. SERVICE, R/O. BAPAT GALLI,TQ. & DIST. BELAGAVI. _. RESPONDENT THIS PRTITION IS FILED UNDER SBCTION XLVII RULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN I.T.A. NO.100018/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J..MADEB THR FOLLOWING: ORDER In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petitiondeserves to be dismissed. 2.It is significant to note that this appeal isfiled with an inordinate delay of 712 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. | 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. sd/-.JUDGE| hnm sd/-.JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan