Rp/100178/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Durdeneshwar Urban Co-Operative
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100178/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Durdeneshwar Urban Co-Operative
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/100178/2017 Of The Commisioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. Shri Durdeneshwar Urban Co-Operative, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH.
DATBRD THIS THER DAY OF JANUARY, 2018
PRESENT
THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND.
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA|
R.P. NO.100178/2017
BBRIWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)BBLAGAVI 590 OO]BBLAGAVI 590 OO]
2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKB
WARD NO.1(3), BELAGAVI-590001.
_. PRHTITIONBRS.
(BY SRI: Y V RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI DURDUNBSHWAR URBAN _CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD., |NIDASOSHI, TQ. HUKKERI,DISTRICT BELAGAVI-59000 1.RBEPRBESEBENTBD BY CHIBF BXBCUTIVE OFFICER|SHRI RAJU $8/O.BHIMAPPA YALAGATTIAGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,SON OF SHRI BHIMAPPA.
.. RESPONDENT
THIS PRTITION IS FILED UNDER SBCTION XLVII RULE 1 OF C.P.C. PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN I.T.A. NO.100023/2015 ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,|S.SUJATHA J..MADEB THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 711 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
sd/-.JUDGE|
nnm
od/-)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue