Rp/100179/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. The Plus Urban Credit Sohard

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH. DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018| PRESENT THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA AND. THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA| R.P. NO.100179/2017 BBRIWEEN 1.|THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)' FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,|' FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,| OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL, DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BBRLAGAVI-59000 1 |THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO.1, NIPPANI, TALUK:CHIKKODI, DISTRICT: BBELAGAVI _. PRHTITIONBRS (BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.) ANTTHR PLUS URBAN CRBDIT SOHARDA|SAHAKARI NIYAMIT, NIPPANT,TALUK:CHIKKODI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI.BY ITS SECRETARY, SRI JEEVAN CHOUGALE,AGED MAJOR, RESIDENT OF NIPPANI,TALUK:CHIKKODI, DISTRICT: BELAGAVI-59000 1 _. RESPONDENT THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF.CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100064/2014, ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD. THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [.A. THIS.DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING: 7 OD 3 ORDER The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed. 2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 7160 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. | 3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017. Sd/- JUDGE| hnm Sd/-JUDGE