Rp/100180/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sri Chandraprabhu Urban Co-Operative
High Court
05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100180/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sri Chandraprabhu Urban Co-Operative
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100180/2017 Of The Income Tax Officer v. Sri Chandraprabhu Urban Co-Operative, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH.
DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018|
PRESENT
THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND.
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA|
R.P. NO.100180/2017& R.P. NO.100011/2018
BBRIWEEN
THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1, NIPPANI,
... PETITIONBR
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANTSRI CHANDRAPRABHU URBAN CO-OPERATIVECREDIT SOCIETY LID.,.CHIKKODI ROAD, NIPPANI-591237|REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,VASANT SHRIPATI BHAKTE,|AGE:99 YEARS,»/O. SRI SHRIPATI BHATKE.
_.. RESPONDENTTHRSKB PRTITIONS ARB FILED UNDBR ORDER XLVILRULK 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO RBVIBW THR ORDBR DATED|21.09.2015PASSEDBY|THIS|HON’BLBECOURTIN|ITA|NOS.100043 & 45 OF 2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE|HIGHCOURTOF|KARNATAKA,DHARW AIBENCH|ATDHARWAD).THERESE PRETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [ATHIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
The issue involved in these review petitions aresquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petitions deserve to bedismissed.
2.It 1s significant to note that these petitionsare filed with an inordinate delay of 71/7 days. Nosatisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petitions as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stand dismissed in terms of the order of thisCourt in R.P. No.100117/2017..
Sd/-
JUDGE|
hnm
Sd/-|JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.