Rp/100199/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ramalingeshwar Credit
High Court
29 Mar 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100199/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ramalingeshwar Credit
Date of order
29 Mar 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100199/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Ramalingeshwar Credit, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In view of the oral submission made by the learned counsel for the Review Petitioner, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29 DAY OF MARCH, 2019
PRESENT :
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA
AND
THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
R.P.No.100199/2017 INI.T.A.No.100055/2016
BETWEEN:
1.The Principal Commissioner
of Income Tax, Dr.B.R. Ambedkar Veedhi, Belagavi.
2.The Income Tax Officer,
W-1, Bagalkot.
…Petitioners
(By Sri. Y.V. Raviraj, Advocate)
AND:
M/s Ramalingeshwar Credit
Co-operative Society Ltd, Kundargi. Tal: Bilagi, Dist: Bagalkot – 587 116.
…Respondent
This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC praying to review the order dated:21.06.2017, passed in the ITA No.100055/2016 on the file of Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench at Dharwad.
RP 100199/2017 in
ITA No.100055/2016
This Review Petition coming on for Orders through Video
Conference (Dharwad Bench matter), this day, K.N.PHANEENDRA, J.,madethe following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the Review Petitioner Sri Y.V.Raviraj
submits that Review Petition may be dismissed as withdrawn.
2. In view of the oral submission made by the learned counsel for the Review Petitioner, the Review Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the Review Petition, the pending application i.e., IA.1/2017 does not survive for consideration and accordingly, the same is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
bk/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue