Case Law › High Court › Rp/100202/2017 Of The Principal Commissi...

Rp/100202/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr Prabhakar Kore Credit

High Court 15 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · karhcdharwad

Parties

Date of order

15 Mar 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Rp/100202/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr Prabhakar Kore Credit, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: IA No.1/2017 and the review petition are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 15[th]DAY OF MARCH, 2018 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND. THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDIT| RP No.100202/2017 | BETWEEN 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXDR BR AMBEDKAR VEEDRHI,BELAGAVI.DR BR AMBEDKAR VEEDRHI,BELAGAVI. 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICERNLILPPANLNLILPPANL _.. PETITIONERS (BY SRI Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV.) AND DR PRABHAKAR KORE CREDIT|SOUHARD SAHAKARI NIYAMITH,|TAL:CHIKODI, DIST:BELAGAVI.-5912701. ~., RESPONDENT RP.No.100202/201/7 THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED5/7/2016 PASSED IN THE ITA NO.100037/2016 ON THEFILE OF THE HON'’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD. THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING|ON|INTERLOCUTORY.APPLICATIONTHISDAY,H.G.RAMESH, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)% Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks| leave to withdraw IA No.1/2017 and the review petition. Leave granted. IA No.1/2017 and the review petition are accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. Petition disposed of. Vmb| Sd/-JUDGE Sd/-|JUDGE|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.