Rp/100208/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Beereshwar Credit Souhard
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100208/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Beereshwar Credit Souhard
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100208/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri. Beereshwar Credit Souhard, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100208/2017
BETWEHEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1(1),
BBRLAGAVI-591307
... PRTTTIONBR
(BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND:
1.SRI. BEBRESHWAR CREDIT SOUHARD|SAHAKARI LID.SAHAKARI LID.
AT POST EXAMBA, TALUK:CHIKKODI,
BELAGAVI-DISTRIC T-590002.
... RESPONDEN
THIS PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1OF CPC PRAYING TO RBVIEW THR ORDER DATED|21.09.2015 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN NO.100109/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
7 OD 3
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.|No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petition|deserves to be dismissecd.
2.It is significant to note that this appeal is filed|with an inordinate delay of 712 days. No satisfactory|reasons are assigned to condone the delay. Hence, I.A.|seeking condonation of delay has to be rejected.
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.|No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order of this|Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
od/-|JUDGE|
JTR
sd/-.JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue