Rp/100239/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Beereshwar Credit
High Court
22 Jan 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100239/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Beereshwar Credit
Date of order
22 Jan 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100239/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri Beereshwar Credit, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA|DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 22 DAY OF JANUARY, 2018)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100239/2017
BETWEHEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(APPEALS),
DR. AMBEDKAR ROAD,
BBRLAGAVI-59000 1
2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD NO.1(1),
NIPPANI-590001_
... PRTTTIONBR
(BY SRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND:
1.SRI. BEBRESHWAR CREDIT
SOUHARD SAHAKARI LTD.,AT POST:EXAMBA,TALUK: CHIKKODI,BBRLAGAVI-DISTRICT.AT POST:EXAMBA,TALUK: CHIKKODI,BBRLAGAVI-DISTRICT.
... RESPONDEN
THIS PRTITION [IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1OF CPC PRAYING TO RBVIEW THR ORDER DATED|21.09.2015 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN NO.100126/2014, ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH|COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THR FOLLOWING:
ORDER
In view of the order passed by this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018, this review petitiondeserves to be dismissed.
? It is significant to note that this appeal isfiled with an inordinate delay of 7o5/ days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
sd/-.JUDGE|
JTR
od/-)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue