Rp/100245/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. The Belgaum Merchants
High Court
05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100245/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. The Belgaum Merchants
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/100245/2017 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) v. The Belgaum Merchants, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH.DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018|
PRESENT
THER HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK JOHN MICHABL CUNHA
R.P. NO.100245/2017
BETWEEN :
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),33RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,33RD FLOOR, PHIROZ KHIMJI COMPLEX,
OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,
DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001.
2.THER INCOME TAX OFFICKBWARD NO.1(2)WARD NO.1(2)
OPPOSITE TO CIVIL HOSPITAL,DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001.DR.AMBEDKAR ROAD, BELAGAVI 590001.
—. PRHTITIONBRS
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
ANT
THR BELGAUM MBRCHANTS|CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,CTS NO.605, 1ST FLOOR,ANSURKAR GALLI, BELAGAVI-991217REPRESENIED BY ITS CHAIRMAN,K.RATNAKAR N.SHETTY,AGED 63 YEARS, OCC:SERVICE,RESIDENT OF BELAGAVI. |.. RESPONDENT
THIS PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII RULE 1 OF.CPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDER DATED 21.09.2015.PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100044/2014, ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS ON [.A. THIS.DAY,S.SUJATHA J..MADE THR FOLLOWING:
7 OD 3
ORDER
The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed.
2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 7/7609 days. Nsatisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
Sd/-
JUDGE|
hnm
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.