Rp/100249/2017 Of Income Tax Officer v. Sree Rebuka Co Operative
High Court
05 Feb 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/100249/2017 Of Income Tax Officer v. Sree Rebuka Co Operative
Date of order
05 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/100249/2017 Of Income Tax Officer v. Sree Rebuka Co Operative, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH.
DATEBD THIS THE DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2018|
PRESENT
THRE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
AND.
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JOHN MICHABL CUNHA|
R.P. NO.100249/2017
BBRIWEEN
1.INCOME TAX OFFICEHKWARD 2(2), BELAGAVIWARD 2(2), BELAGAVI
2.THER COMMISSIONBR OF
INCOME TAX(APPEALS), BELAGAVI.
—. PRHTITIONBRS
(BY SRI Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AND
SREB RE BUKA CO-OPBRATIVECREDIT SOCIETY LTD,HOTEL DEERTI CAMPUS,P B ROAD, BELAGAVI,|RBEPRBSEBENTBD BY ITS SKHCRETSRI SHANKAR T.S., AGE. MAJOR.
.. RESPONDENT
THIS PBRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER XLVI] RULE 1 OFCPC PRAYING TO REVIEW THR ORDBR DATBED 21.09.2019PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO.100097/2014, ON.THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,|DHARWAD BRNCH AT DHARWAD.
THIS PETITION COMING ON KOR ORDERS ON I[.A. THISDAY,S.SUJATHA J.,MADE THE FOLLOWING:)
7 OD 3
ORDER
The issue involved in this review petition issquarely covered by the order of this Court in R.P.No.100117/2017 dated 22.01.2018. In view of thesame, the present review petition deserves to bedismissed.
2.It 1s significant to note that this petition isfiled with an inordinate delay of 7/73 days. No)satisfactory reasons are assigned to condone the delay. —Hence, I.A. seeking condonation of delay has to berejected. |
3.Accordingly, review petition as well as I.A.No.1/2017 stands dismissed in terms of the order ofthis Court in R.P. No.100117/2017.
Sd/-
JUDGE|
hnm
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.