Case Law › High Court › Rp/100270/2017 Of The Principal Commissi...

Rp/100270/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Siddashri Pattin Souharda

High Court 27 Mar 2018 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · karhcdharwad

Parties

Date of order

27 Mar 2018

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Rp/100270/2017 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Siddashri Pattin Souharda, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: Thereview petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA.DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 27 DAY OF MARCH, 2018) PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.G.RAMESH AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.G.PANDITREVIEW PETITION No.100270/2017 — BETWEEN 1.THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHL,|BELAGAVIL.DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHL,|BELAGAVIL. 2.THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIJAYAPUR .. PETITIONERS) (BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S SIDDASHRI PATTIN SOQUHARDA SAHAKARI NIYAMITH,| S.5. ROAD, VIJAYAPUR, PAN: AAAJS33/27F .. RESPONDENT| THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE LOF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DTD:05.07.2016|PASSED IN THE ITA NO.100034/2016 ON THE FILE OF HON BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AT DHARWAD. R.P.No.1002/0/201/7 “oO: THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,H.G.RAMESH, J. MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER H.G.RAMESH, J. (Oral)# This review petition is listed for orders re. noncompliance of office objections raised on the. petition.However, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners seeks|leave to withdraw the review petition. Leave granted. Thereview petition is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. Petition disposed of. Jm/-— Sd/-JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.