Case Law › High Court › Rp/110/2020 Of The Principal Commissione...

Rp/110/2020 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms/.Appollo Tyres Ltd

High Court 13 Jan 2021 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · highcourtofkerala

Parties

Date of order

13 Jan 2021

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/110/2020 Of The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Ms/.Appollo Tyres Ltd, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.ANIL KUMAR WEDNESDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JANUARY 2021 / 23TH POUSHA, 1942 RP.No.110 OF 2020 IN ITA. 287/2010 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT IN ITA NO.287/2010 OF HIGH COURT OF KERALADATED 22.02.2019 REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT IN ITA: THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,KOCHI-1, KOCHI. BY ADVS.SRI.P.K.RAVINDRANATHA MENON (SR.)JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT IN ITA: MS/.APPOLLO TYRES LTD6TH FLOOR, CHERUPUSHPAM BUILDINGS, SHANMUGHAM ROAD, KOCHI 31. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 13.01.2021, THECOURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: & RP.No.110 OF 2020 IN ITA. 287/2010 2 Shaffique, J ORDER This review petition had been filed with a petition tocondone the delay of 179 days in filing the reviewpetition. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the Department submitsthat similar review petitions have already been dismissedin a batch of petitions as per order dated 18.03.2020 inR.P.No.1161 of 2019 in ITA No.16/2013 and connectedcases. As far as the present review petition is alsoconcerned, it has to suffer the same fate. that similar review petitions have already been dismissedin a batch of petitions as per order dated 18.03.2020 inR.P.No.1161 of 2019 in ITA No.16/2013 and connectedcases. As far as the present review petition is alsoconcerned, it has to suffer the same fate. 3. In the result, the review petition and C.M.Application aredismissed.dismissed. Sd/- A.M.SHAFFIQUE, JUDGE sd/- N. ANIL KUMAR, JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.