Rp/113/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.n.surendra Reddy
High Court
21 Oct 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/113/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.n.surendra Reddy
Date of order
21 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/113/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Sri.k.n.surendra Reddy, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following order : ORDER Review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21 DAY OF OCTOBER 2022
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI
REVIEW PETITION NO.113OF2022
IN
ITANO.33OF2006
BETWEEN:
1 . THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. LTU, 7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095.
2 . THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXCIRCLE 11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS CIRCLE 11(2), PRESENT ADDRESS
DCIT, CIRCLE-1, LTU,
7 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING, 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095. 6 BLOCK, 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA, BENGALURU – 560 095.
...PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. ARAVIND K V, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. K.N. SURENDRA REDDY KARTHA OF HUF AND SMT. VINUTHA S REDDY,NO. 109, 7 ‘C’ MAIN, 5 BLOCK, KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE.
….RESPONDENT
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HONBLE COURT TO I. REVIEW / RECALL THE ORDER DATED 09/01/2020 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA NO. 33/2006. II. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HONBLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ASHOK S. KINAGI, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. The petitioners have filed this review petition to recall the order dated 9.1.2020 passed by this Court in ITA No.33/2006 on the ground that the Tribunal committed an error in passing the order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and the Tribunal in its earlier order dated 18.1.2005 had not considered the issue and the assessee had withdrawn the ground before the Appellate Commissioner and the same had been amortalized by Compaq for a period of 36 months and only
Rs.1,25,00,000/- had been claimed during the current assessment year.
3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners
and perused the order passed in ITA No.33/2006 dated 9.1.2020.
4. We do not find any error apparent on the face of record. Accordingly, we proceed to pass the following order :
ORDER
Review petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/- JUDGE
rs
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.