Case Law › High Court › Rp/1165/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income T...

Rp/1165/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.h.e.distillery Private Limited

High Court 18 Dec 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

18 Dec 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/1165/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S.h.e.distillery Private Limited, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the petition is dismissed.Consequently,theapplication for.condonation of delay is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BBNGALURUDATBD THIS THR 18 DAY OF DECEMBER 2014. PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK N. KUMAR ANTI THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICK B MANOHARR.P.NO.1165/2014 IN ITA.NO.350/2009 BETWEEN: 1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,284/1, PARK VIEW BUILDING,4 MAIN, P.J.EXTENSION,DAVANAGERE. 2. THRE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2),RASHTRATHANA BHAVAN,BENGALURU_.. PHTITIONERS| (BY SRI.E.LSANMATHI, ADV.) ANT) M/S.H.E.DISTILLERY PRIVATE LIMITED,B.H.ROAD, OPP. MEENAKSI,SHIVAMOGGA.—. RESPONDENT | THR REVIBW PRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER 47.RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING THIS HON'BLE COURT TO)REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 01/08/2014 PASSED IN ITANO.350/2009 BY THE DIVISION BENCH OF THIS HON'BLE|COURT. THIS REVIEW PEHEITIION COMING ON KORORDERS, THIS DAY,AUMAR, J.|2MADE THE FOLLOWING: | 2 ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. We do not see any merits. Hence, the petition is dismissed.Consequently,theapplication for.condonation of delay is also dismissed. RS/*| sD/-JUDGE | sD/- JUDGE|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.