Rp/1389/2014 Of M/S. Maa Communication Bozell Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATEKED THIS THE [‘T]DAY OF AUGUST 2015) PRESENT THR HON BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR|AN 1 THR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICK B.MANOHAR. REVIEW PETITION.NO.1389/2014 TN|I.T.A. NO.523/2006| BBRHIWEE M/S. MAA COMMUNICATION BOZELL LTDNOW KNOWN AS M/S. MAACOMMUNICATIONS LITD.,NO.6, SERVICE ROAD,DOMLUR, BANGALORE - 56007 1 . PRHTITIONBR (BY SRI.SRINIVAS.V.RAGHAVAN, ADV FOR| SRI. NITIN.R, ADV.,) | AN): 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE,C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE. 2.THR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OFINCOME TAX, CIRCLE — 12(1),C.R.BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.| THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED UNDER ORDER 47.RULE 1 OF THE CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE, 1908)PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED: 04/09/2013|PASSED IN ITA NO. 9523/2006, ON THE FILE OF THEHON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. THIS REVIEW PERTITION [S COMING ON FORORDERSTHIS|DAY,N.KUMARJ.,MADETHERFOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. 2 |We do not see any justification to entertain thereview petition. Even if there is some error as stated bythe learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court hadappreciated the facts of the case and materials placedon record and recorded a finding. If that finding has no legal basis, and there is some error, the petitioner hassot remedy of an appeal and not by filing the review. Nomerits in this review petition. Accordingly, it is.dismissed. However, dismissal of this review petition wouldnot come in the way of the review petitioner to work outhis remedy if any, in accordance with law against thefinancier. _* | mp od/-| JUDGE od/-JUDGE