Case LawHigh Court › Rp/139/2014 Of C.t.chacko v. The Commiss...

Rp/139/2014 Of C.t.chacko v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 14 Mar 2014 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/139/2014 Of C.t.chacko v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
14 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/139/2014 Of C.t.chacko v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT: THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE DR. MANJULA CHELLUR & THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.M.SHAFFIQUE FRIDAY, THE 14TH DAY OF MARCH 2014/23RD PHALGUNA, 1935 RP.No. 139 of 2014 -------------------------- [IN THE COMMON JUDGMENT OF THIS HON'BLE COURT IN I.T.A. NO.198/2012 DATED 03/12/2013] ................. REVIEW PETITIONER/APPELLANT: ------------------------------------------------- C.T.CHACKO, CHALUVELIL, THOTTACKADU, CHENGANACHERRY. BY SRI.T.M.SREEDHARAN, SENIOR ADVOCATE, ADVS.SRI.V.P.NARAYANAN, SMT.BOBY M.SEKHAR, SMT.DIVYA RAVINDRAN. RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT: ------------------------------------------- THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, AAYAKAR BHAVAN, KOWDIAR, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM-695 003. BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, S.C. THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 14-03-2014, ALONG WITH R.P. NO.140/2014 AND CONNECTED CASES, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Manjula Chellur, C.J. & A.M. Shaffique, J. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - R.P. No. 139 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.198 of 2012R.P. No. 140 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.215 of 2012R.P. No. 141 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.216 of 2012R.P. No. 142 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.217 of 2012R.P. No. 143 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.218 of 2012R.P. No. 144 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.219 of 2012and R.P. No. 145 of 2014 in I.T.A. No.220 of 2012- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - -Dated this the 14[th] day of March, 2014 Manjula Chellur, C.J. O R D E R We have gone through the averments in the ReviewPetitions. On going through the judgment in detail, fromparagraph 11 onwards issues raised in the Review Petitions areclearly discussed and ultimately questions of law raised wereanswered against the appellant/assessee. There is no apparenterror on the face of record. Accordingly, the Review Petitionsare dismissed. Manjula Chellur, Chief Justice. ttb/14/03 A.M. Shaffique, Judge.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan