Rp/1507/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Renuka Enterprises
High Court
04 Sep 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/1507/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Renuka Enterprises
Date of order
04 Sep 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/1507/2011 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Renuka Enterprises, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD.
DATED THIS THE 4 DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.K.PATIL
AND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.V.PINTO
-R.P.NOS.15071509/2011
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
KHIMJIBHOI COMPLEX,
OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL,
BELGAUM.
2.INCOME TAX OFFICER,
WARD-I (1), BELGAUM.
… PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.Y.V.RAVIRAJ, ADV)
AND:
M/S.RENUKA ENTERPRISES,NO.5, ANGOL INDUSTRIAL ESTATE,UDYAMBHAG, BELGAUM.
… RESPONDENT
THESE PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1R/W SECTION 151 OF CPC PAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDERDT.10.12.2010 PASSED IN THE ITA 194/2007 AND CONNECTEDMATTERS ON THE FILE OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OFKARNATAKA, CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,N.K.PATIL J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though these matters are posted for orders forfurnishing of correct postal address for issue of notice to therespondent, the same is taken up for final disposal.
2.In these petitions, the petitioners have sought toreview the judgment dated 10.12.2010 passed inI.T.A.NO.194/2007 and connected matters.
3.We have heard the learned counsel for the petitionersand perused the judgment under review.
4.After careful perusal of the judgment under review, wedo not find any error on the face of it nor we find anygrounds as such made out to consider the relief sought in theinstant review petitions. Hence, the review petitions filed bythe petitioners is dismissed as devoid of merits reservingliberty to the petitioners to work out their remedy in
accordance with law before the appropriate forum if the need
so arises.
Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE
JUDGE
Jm/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.