Rp/1534/2011 Of Arun G Toppannavar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
19 Oct 2012 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/1534/2011 Of Arun G Toppannavar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
19 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/1534/2011 Of Arun G Toppannavar v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
-]-
IN THRE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKCIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATHD THIS THR 19 DAY OF OCTOBBR 2012PRBSENT
THR HON’BRBLE MR. JUSTICK K.L.MANJUNAANT
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICEK B. MANOH
R.P. NO.19534/201
BRTWEEN#
Arun G. Toppannavar,3941, Basav Nagar,Club Road, Belgaum.
— PRTTTIONER
(By Shri A.Shankar for Shri Shashank 8.Hegde, Advocate)
AND:
1)The Commissioner of Income Tax,Belgaum,
2.Income Tax Officer,Ward 2(1), Belgaum.
... RESPONDE
(By Shri Y.V.Raviraj, Advocate)
This RP is filed under Order 4/7 Rule 1 of CPCpraying to review the order dated 08.03.2011 passed in theITA No.1424/2006 on the file of High Court of Karnataka,Circuit Bench at Dharwad.
This petition coming on for admission this day,K.L.Manjunath J., delivered the following:-
ORDER
Having heard the learned counsel appearing for thepetitioner. We do not see any ground to review the orderand if the appellant is aggrieved by the order passed in ITANo. 1424/2006, it is open for him to challenge the sambefore the Hon’ble Apex Court.
Accordingly, the review petition is dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
>&(D
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue