Rp/1547/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr Rajendra B.nerli, 66, Model Co-Op Housing
High Court
11 Oct 2012 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/1547/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr Rajendra B.nerli, 66, Model Co-Op Housing
Date of order
11 Oct 2012
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/1547/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Dr Rajendra B.nerli, 66, Model Co-Op Housing, the High Court (2012) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
CIRCUIT BENCH AT DHARWAD
DATED THIS THE 11 DAY OF OCTOBER 2012
PRESENT
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE K. L. MANJUNATHAND
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
BETWEEN"
RP No.1546/2012
1.THR COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME TAX
KHIMJILBHAIL COMPL
OPP. CIVIL HOSPITAL, BELGAUM & ANR.
2.INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1 (2), BELGAUM
... PETTITIONER(S
(By Sri. : Y V RAVIRAJ, ADV.)
AN
DR RAJENDRA B.NERLI, 066 MODECO-OP HOUSING SOCIETY LTD.,MARKET YARD, BELGAUM
... RESPONDENTS)
THIS REVIEW PETITION FILED U/O. -- RULE --R/W. SEC. --- OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT ANDORDER DT:22.09.2011 IN I.T.A. NO.220/2008 ON THEFILE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, CIRCUITBENCH, DHARWAD.
THIS RP COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,K.L.MANJUNATH, J,PASSED THR FOLLOWING:-
ORDER
Having heard the counsel for the petitioners,under similar circumstances arising between the same
parties, RP No.1543/2012 a/w RP No.1545/2012 aredismissed by the Coordinate Bench of this Court on1/10/2012,
Therefore,the|presentreviewpetition$6dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
Vmb
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.