Rp/156/2021 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jose Thomas
High Court
09 Mar 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/156/2021 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jose Thomas
Date of order
09 Mar 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/156/2021 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Jose Thomas, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: I have no reason to think that thepetitioners are interested in prosecuting the writ petition.The Review petition is dismissed for non prosecution. sab Sd/- AMIT RAWAL JUDGE RP.No.156 OF 2021 IN WP(C).
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT RAWAL
TUESDAY, THE 09TH DAY OF MARCH 2021 / 18TH PHALGUNA, 1942
RP.No.156 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 40544/2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN WP(C) 40544/2018(P) OF HIGH COURT OFKERALA
REVIEW PETITIONER/S:
1COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXC.R.BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI,PIN-682 018
2JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NON CORPORATE RANGE, NON CORP.CIRCLE 1 (1) 3RD FLOOR,C.R.BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI,PIN-682 018
3ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,NON CORPORATE RANGE, NON CORP.CIRCLE 1910,3RD FLOOR, C.R.BUILDING, I.S PRESS ROAD, KOCHI,PIN-682 018
BY ADV. SRI.CHRISTOPHER ABRAHAM
RESPONDENT/S:
JOSE THOMAS
S/O. N.J.THOMAS, RESIDING AT XXX/1045,MURALI LANE, KANIAMPURAZHA ROAD, ERNAKULAM,PIN-682 019
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON09.03.2021, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Dated this the 9[th] day of March 2021
There is no representation on behalf of the reviewpetitioners/respondents. I have no reason to think that thepetitioners are interested in prosecuting the writ petition.The Review petition is dismissed for non prosecution.
sab
Sd/-
AMIT RAWAL
JUDGE
RP.No.156 OF 2021 IN WP(C). 40544/2018
3
APPENDIX
PETITIONER'S/S EXHIBITS:
ANNEXURE-1CERTIFIED COPY OF THE JUDGMENT IN WPC NO.45044 DATED 17.02.2020
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.