Rp/157/2022 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Shri Narendra R Thappetta
High Court
09 Dec 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/157/2022 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Shri Narendra R Thappetta
Date of order
09 Dec 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/157/2022 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax Iii v. Shri Narendra R Thappetta, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitallysigned by CMALATHILocation:High CourtofKarnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9 DAY OF DECEMBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REVIEW PETITION NO. 157 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX III
CENTRAL REVENUE BUILDINGS
QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE-560 001 BANGALORE-560 001
2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE 7 (1)
BANGALORE. …PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. SANMATHI E I., ADVOCATE)
AND:
SHRI NARENDRA R THAPPETTA NO.158 IST PHASE PALM MEADOWS AIRPORT WHITEFIELD ROAD, BANGALORE-560 066 …RESPONDENT
(NOTICE IS NOT ORDERED IN RESPECT OF RESPONDENT)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC PRAYING TO A) REVIEW JUDGMENT DATED
10/09/2020 PASSED IN ITA NO. 12/2016.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J, MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Sri E.I.Sanmathi, learned counsel for the petitioners.
2. This review petition has been filed seeking review
of the judgment dated 10.09.2020 passed in ITA No.12/2016.
3. After hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, we find that the impugned judgment neither suffers from any infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the record, warranting interference of this Court in the review jurisdiction.
In the result, review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue