Rp/1579/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S V R S G Bulk Carriers, Kreedabhavan Building
High Court
26 Mar 2014 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karhcdharwad
Parties
Rp/1579/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S V R S G Bulk Carriers, Kreedabhavan Building
Date of order
26 Mar 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Rp/1579/2012 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S V R S G Bulk Carriers, Kreedabhavan Building, the High Court (2014) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKADHARWAD BENCH
Dated this the 26[th] day of March 2014
Present
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE A.S. BOPANNA
and
THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. SREENIVASE GOWDA
Between:
Review Petition No.1579/2012in I.T.A. No.5031/2009
1. The Commissioner of Income Tax,C.R.Building, Navanagar, Hubli.
2. The Asst. Commissioner of Income
Tax, Circle-3(1), Hubli.
…Petitioners
(By Sri. Y.V. Raviraj, Advocate)
A n d :
M/s. V.R.S.G. Bulk Carriers,Kreedabhavan Building,Basaveshwar Circle,Dharwad Road, Haliyal.
…Respondent
(By Sri. H.R.Kambiyavar, Advocate)
This petition is filed under Order XLVII Rule 5 readwith Section 151 of CPC against the judgment and orderdated 06.01.2012 in ITA No.5031/2009 on the file of theHigh Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench, Dharwad.
This petition coming on for Orders this day,A.S. Bopanna, J, made the following:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memodated 26.03.2014 which reads as hereunder:
“ Memo for Withdrawal
The Petitioner/Appellants in the above matterrespectfully pray that this Hon’ble Court maybe pleased to permit the Petitioner/Appellantsto withdraw the R.P No.1579/2009 in I.T.A.No.5031/2009 in the interest of justice andequity.”
In terms of the memo, petition is disposed of aswithdrawn. Consequently, I.A.No.1/2012 also standsdisposed of.
Sd/-JUDGE
Sd/-JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue