Case Law › High Court › Rp/159/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/159/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ram Nutrients Ltd

High Court 07 Jul 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · mphc_db_ind

Parties

Date of order

07 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/159/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Shri Ram Nutrients Ltd, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: No.159/2016 is allowed and the impugned order is set aside.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the review petitioner. None for the respondent, though served. Heard. An affidavit dated 07.07.2017 has been filed regarding service of dasti notice to the respondent. Inspite of that, no one is appearing to oppose the review petition. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the amount involved in the Income Tax Appeal was more than Rs.20.00 lacs and, therefore, as per Circular dated 10.12.2015, issued by the Government of India under the signature of Commissioner of Income Tax (AJ), CBDT, New Delhi, the appeal has to be decided on merit. On due consideration of the aforesaid so also the fact that the monetary limit involved in ITA No.17/2009 is more than Rs.20.00 lacs, we review the order dated 15.02.2016 passed in ITA No.17/2009. Accordingly, R. P. No.159/2016 is allowed and the impugned order is set aside. (P. K. Jaiswal) Judge (Virender Singh) Judge gp

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.