Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2071.
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
BETWEEN:
R.P. NO.161 OF 2021
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.
TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©
D2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS).CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA)
.., PETITIONERS|
AND"
M/S TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED2.H.B COMPLEX, LOOFT. BIM RING ROAD|BIM 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT |BANGALORE-560048.
(BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,)
~. RESPONDENT
THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 R/W SECTION114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED.13.10.2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.329/2013. TO PASS SUITABLE
ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED|IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE.INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS|R Pp COMINGON.FOR.ORDERS,|THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking recall of
thejudgmentdated13.10.2070|passedInI.T.A.No.329/2013.
2 |After hearing learned counsel for the parties
and taking note of the fact that substantial question of law No.2 has not been answered in the judgment, the|
judgment dated 13.10.2020 is recalled. In the result,|
IL.T.A.No.329/2013 is restored to file.
Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
Sd/-—JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.