Case LawHigh Court › Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited

High Court 12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/161/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, review petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2071. PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD BETWEEN: R.P. NO.161 OF 2021 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032. TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR © D2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS).CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32. (BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA) .., PETITIONERS| AND" M/S TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED2.H.B COMPLEX, LOOFT. BIM RING ROAD|BIM 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT |BANGALORE-560048. (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 R/W SECTION114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED.13.10.2020 PASSED IN ITA NO.329/2013. TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED|IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE.INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS|R Pp COMINGON.FOR.ORDERS,|THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | ORDER This petition has been filed seeking recall of thejudgmentdated13.10.2070|passedInI.T.A.No.329/2013. 2 |After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that substantial question of law No.2 has not been answered in the judgment, the| judgment dated 13.10.2020 is recalled. In the result,| IL.T.A.No.329/2013 is restored to file. Accordingly, review petition is allowed. Sd/- JUDGE. Sd/-—JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan