Rp/162/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited
High Court
12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/162/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/162/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Pvt Limited, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2071.
PRESENT|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND|
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASADR.P. NO.162 OF 2021
BETWEEN:
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.
TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©
D2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS).CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.
(BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA)
.., PETITIONERS|
AND"
M/S TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED2.H.B COMPLEX, LOOFT. BIM RING ROAD|BIM 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT |BANGALORE-560048.
(BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,)
~. RESPONDENT
THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.10.2020PASSED IN ITA NO.330/2013. TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS THAT
THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTSAND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OFJUSTICE AND EQUITY. —
THIS|R Pp COMINGON.FOR.ORDERS,|THISDAY,ALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: |
ORDER
This petition nas been filed seeking recall of tne
judgmentdated|13.10.7070|passed.In|
IL.T.A.No.330/2013.
2 |After hearing learned counsel for the partiesand taking note of the fact that substantial question of law No.2 has not Deen answered in the judgment, thejudgment dated 13.10.2020 Is recalled. In the result,
I.T.A.No.330/2013 is restored to file.
Accordingly, review petition is allowed.
Sd/-
JUDGE.
SS|
Sd/-—JUDGE.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.