Case LawHigh Court › Rp/163/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/163/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Private Ltd

High Court 12 Nov 2021 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/163/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Private Ltd
Date of order
12 Nov 2021
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Rp/163/2021 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax Tds v. M/S Ttk Health Care Tpa Private Ltd, the High Court (2021) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, review petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2071. PRESENT| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND| THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASADR.P. NO.163 OF 2021 BETWEEN: 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAXTDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032.TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR ©BELLARY ROAD, GANGANAGARBANGALORE 560 032. TDS, NO.59, HMT BHAVAN, 4TH FLOOR © D2 |THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (TDS).CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32.CIRCLE-18(2) NO.59, HMT BHAVAN |4TH FLOOR, BELLARY ROAD —GANGANAGAR, BANGALORE-560 O32. (BY SRI. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, AGA) .., PETITIONERS| AND" M/S TTK HEALTHCARE TPA PRIVATE LIMITED2.H.B COMPLEX, LOOFT. BIM RING ROAD|BIM 1ST STAGE, BTM LAYOUT |BANGALORE-560048. (BY SRI. T. SURYANARAYANA, ADV.,) ~. RESPONDENT THIS R.P. IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 13.10.2020PASSED IN ITA NO.332/2013. TO PASS SUITABLE ORDERS THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTSAND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OFJUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS|R Pp COMINGON.FOR.ORDERS,|THISALOK ARADHE J.,DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: | DAY, ORDER This petition has been filed seeking recall of the judgmentdated|13.10.2020|passed.In| I.T.A.No.332/2013. 2.|After hearing learned counsel for the parties and taking note of the fact that substantial question oflaw No.2 has not Deen answered in the judgment, thejudgment dated 13.10.2020 is recalled. In the result,| I.T.A.No.332/2013 is restored to file. Accordingly, review petition is allowed. Sd/-— JUDGE. Sd/-JUDGE.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan