Case Law › High Court › Rp/171/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/171/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Ice Network (P) Ltd

High Court 07 Nov 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

07 Nov 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/171/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Ice Network (P) Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE | DATED THIS THE 7 DAY OF NOVEMBER 2014 PRESENT THERE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE N.KUMA AN D THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH| REVIBW PBRTITION NO.171 OF 201 INITA NO.461 OF 2008 BETWEEN: 1.The Commissioner of Income-tax|(TDS), No.59, HMT Bhavan,4[.#]Floor, Bellary Road,(TDS), No.59, HMT Bhavan,4[.#]Floor, Bellary Road, Ganganagar,Bangalore.Bangalore. a2The Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (IDS) Range-16,No.59, HMT Bhavan,A[.#]Floor, Bellary Road,No.59, HMT Bhavan,A[.#]Floor, Bellary Road, Ganganagar, Bangalore. ... PETITIONERS (By Sri K.V.Aravind, Advocate) AND: M/s.Ice Network (P) Ltd.,Rajajinagar, Dr.Rajkumar Road, Bangalore — 560 O10. ...RESPONDENT| KRERE This Review Petition is filed under Order 47 Rule 1of CPC praying to review the order dated 21.03.2012passed in ITA.No.461 /2008. This Review Petition coming on for orders this day, N.Kumar J., made the following:- ORDER A memo is filed seeking leave of this court towithdraw the review petition, as against the original order the Revenue has preferred an Special LeavePetition and it is pending before the Hon’ble Apex Court. © 2 |The review petition is dismissed in terms of the memo. Sd/-| JUDGE. sd/-. JUDGE. JJ|

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.