Case Law › High Court › Rp/180/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/180/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.k. Ranganath

High Court 09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/180/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.k. Ranganath, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE Q DAY OF JANUARY 2015) PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR ANT) THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICKH B.MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION No. 180 OF 2013.IN ITA No.10823 OF 200 BBRITWEEN 1.THERE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TA C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE 2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER © OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE —- 1(2) C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE .. PKHTITIONEBRS (BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.) AND : R.K.RANGANATHNO.1, 15 CROSSKILARI ROADBANGALORE —- 560 053 |... RESPONDENT (BY SRI.A.SHANKAR AND M.LAVA, ADVS.) THIS REVIBW PEHRTITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING FOR REVIEW THE ORDER DATED29.09.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1082/2008, ON THE FILE OF)THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA, BANGALORE.| THIS REVIEW PRTITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONTHIS DAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Though in this matter, the revenue has _ no challenged the impugned order before the Apex Court byfiling special leave petition, relying on the order passed inthe other cases, this review petition is filed for the same. reasons. In fact in Circular No.s of 2008 the exception|does not have recurring nature as an item to challengeadverseJudgments.Thisreviewpetition1S|not maintainable. Accordingly, it is dismissed. The dismissal|of this review petition would not come in the way of)revenue reviving the appeal in the event of judgment ofthis Court in the case of|Ranka and Ranka, 72 DTR 274, lS reversed by the Apex Court. Hd| SD/-| JUDGE SD/- JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.