Rp/181/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.k. Ranganath
High Court
09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/181/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.k. Ranganath
Date of order
09 Jan 2015
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/181/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. R.k. Ranganath, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE Q DAY OF JANUARY 2015)
PRESENT
THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICHK B.MANOHAR
REVIEW PETITION No. 181 OF 2013.IN ITA No. 1084 OF 200
BETWEEN :
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE
2.THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER ©
OF INCOME-TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE —- 1(2)
C.R.BUILDING
QUEENS ROAD
BANGALORE .. PETITIONERS
(BY SRI.K.V.ARAVIND, ADV.)
AND :
R.K.RANGANATHNO.1, 15 CROSSKILARI ROADBANGALORE —- 560 053 |
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.A.SHANKAR AND M.LAVA, ADVS.)
THIS REVIBW PEHRTITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING FOR REVIEW THE ORDER DATED29.09.2012 PASSED IN ITA NO.1084/2008, ON THE FILE OF)THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNTAKA, BANGALORE.|
THIS REVIEW PRTITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSIONTHIS DAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Though in this matter, the revenue has _ nochallenged the impugned order before the Apex Court by)filing special leave petition, relying on the order passed inthe other cases, this review petition is filed for the same)
reasons. In fact in Circular No.5 of 2008 the exceptiondoes not have recurring nature as an item to challengeadverseJudgments.Thisreviewpetition1S notmaintainable. Accordingly, it is dismissed. The dismissalof this review petition would not come in the way of)revenue reviving the appeal in the event of judgment ofthis Court in the case of|Ranka and Ranka, 72 DTR
270, is reversed by the Apex Court.
Hd|
SD/-.
JUDGE
SD/-|
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue