In Rp/18/2009 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax 11 Mumbai v. Milind G. Vasudeo, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Even otherwise, the review petition is not maintainable and as such the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
REVIEW PETITION NO.18 OF 2009ININCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.1571 OF 2009
The Commissioner of Income Tax
..Appellant.
V/s.
Milind G. Vasudeo (since deceased)..Respondent.
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for appellant.
Mr. Jitendra Jain with Vishal Phal for respondent.
CORAM : V.C.DAGA AND J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ. DATED : 16TH SEPTEMBER, 2009.
P.C. :-
Heard learned counsel for the revenue and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent. The appeal was filed against a dead person. Now the review petition is also filed against the dead person without impleading the legal heirs of the deceased. Even otherwise, the review petition is not maintainable and as such the same is dismissed with no order as to costs.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(V.C.DAGA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue