Rp/184/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Lever Ltd
High Court
13 Jun 2014 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/184/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Lever Ltd
Date of order
13 Jun 2014
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/184/2014 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Hindustan Lever Ltd, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: This RP is coming on tor Orders, this day, the Court made thefollowing: ORDER S.O. for two weeks to comply with office objections, failingwhich, the petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without|reference to the Bench.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU)
DATED THIS THE 13 DAY OF JUNE, 2014|
PRESENT.
HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE
AND,
HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHAR
RP NO 184 OF 2014
BETWEEN
1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,
CENTRAL CIRCLE,C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.
2THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (TDs)WARD-16(1),C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.
.. PETITIONER(S)
(By srt. ARAVIND K.V. ADVOCATE)
ANI
M/S. HINDUSTAN LEVER LTD.,
BROOKFILEDS,
A
MARATHAHALLI PO,
BENGALURU.
—~ RESPONDENT
The advocate for the petitioner has filed the above ReviewPetition Under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying this Hon'ble Court to review the order dated 30/08/2013 passed in ITA No.142/2007, on thefile of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru.
This RP is coming on tor Orders, this day, the Court made thefollowing:
ORDER
S.O. for two weeks to comply with office objections, failingwhich, the petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution without|reference to the Bench.
Sd/-.
JUDGE
Sd/-|
JUDGE
Ty. By: H.M.N|> R. By: RMC. By: DPS
Ty.Date : 10/3/15C. Date : 05/5/15
Sd/-ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue