In Rp/184/2016 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. Smt Vinita Devi Bagrodia, the High Court (2017) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Review petition is accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
gp
06.01.2017
Ms. Veena Mandlik, learned counsel for the review petitioner.
Ms. Archana Kher, learned counsel for the respondent.
Heard on I.A. No.5785/2016, which is an application for condonation of delay. The review petition is barred by 21 days.
For the reasons assigned in the application, we are of the considered view that the cause shown by the review petitioner is sufficient to condone the delay of 21 days. Accordingly, I.A. No.5785/2016 is allowed and stands disposed of. Delay in filing the review petition is hereby condoned.
Also perused the order dated 04.02.2016 and circular dated 10.12.2015 issued by the Central Government.
There is no error apparent on the face of the record. No case for review, as prayed is made out. Review petition is accordingly, dismissed.
(P. K. Jaiswal)Judge
(J. K. Jain)
Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue