Case Law › High Court › Rp/197/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/197/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Vijaya Bank

High Court 28 Apr 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

28 Apr 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/197/2013 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Vijaya Bank, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: If the office objections are notcomplied, the review petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecutionwithout reference to the Court.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF APRIL, 2014 PRESENT HON’ BLE MR. JUSTICE DILIP B.BHOSALE AND| HON' BLE MR. JUSTICE B.MANOHARRP NO 197 OF 2013 BETWEEN 1.THERE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAC.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU.2.THER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXCIRCLE 12(3),,C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BENGALURU... PETITIONERG)(By SriiK VV. ARAVIND, ADVOCATE) AND1.M/S. VJAYA BANK,HEAD OFFICE NO.41/2, .. PETITIONERG) M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU. .» RESPONDENTS) The Review Petition Under Order 47 Rule 1 of CPC, praying forreview the Order dated 18/07/2012 passed in ITA No.950/2006, on thefile of the Hon'ble High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru. This RP is coming on for Orders, this day, the Court made thefollowing: ORDER At the request of learned counsel for the petitioners, S.O. to06.06.2014, to comply office objections. If the office objections are notcomplied, the review petition shall stand dismissed for non-prosecutionwithout reference to the Court. Sd/-.JUDGETy. By : 8.B.A)R. By: RMCopyC. By: DPS|Ty.Date : 9/03/15 ©Sd/-|C. Date: 13/07/15)I/C ASSISTANT REGISTRAR

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.