Case LawHigh Court › Rp/200/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/200/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd

High Court 15 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/200/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd
Date of order
15 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Rp/200/2016 Of The Commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S. Asea Brown Boveri Ltd, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Decision: Review Petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATEKD THIS THR 1 DAY OF FEBRUARY 2017 PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE JAYANT PATEL AND THR HON’BLE MRS..JUSTICEHK S SUJAT REVIEW PETITION NO.200/2016 INITA NO.1/2011 BETWEEN: 1.THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXC.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.|C.R. BUILDING,QUEENS ROAD,BANGALORE.| 2.THR DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXSPECIAL RANGE-1,MUMBAI.SPECIAL RANGE-1,MUMBAI. 3.THE ASST. COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX - LTU,BANGALORE.|OF INCOME TAX - LTU,BANGALORE.| ...PETITIONERS (BY SRI.LARAVIND K V, ADVOCATE) AND: M/S. ASEA BROWN BOVERI LTD.,KHANIJA BHAWAN, 2 FLOOR, |EAST WING, RACE COURSE ROAD,BANGALORE-560 OO1.. _ RBSPONDENT (BY SRI.SANDEEP HUILGOL, ADVOCATE FOR —oORI.T SURYANARAYANA, ADVOCATE) THIS REVIEW PRTITION IS FILED UNDBR ORDER477 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDERDATED:17/12/2015 PASSED IN ITA NO.1/2011, ON.THR FILB OF THR HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF!KARNATAKA, BENGALURU. THIS PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THISDAY,JAYANT PATEL J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING: ORDER We have heard Mr.K.V.Aravind, learned Counsel| appearing for the petitioners and Mr.Sandeep Huilgol,learned Counsel for Mr.T.Suryanarayana, appearing forthe respondent. 2. There is no dispute on the aspects that the taxeffect of the main ITA is Rs.26,09,718/-. Therefore thesame would be above Rs.20,00,000/- and not coveredby the Circular No.21/2015 dated 10.12.2015. Thisfact could not be brought to the notice of the Courtwhen earlier order was passed in ITA No.1/2011. .Hence the earlier order dated 17.12.2015 in ITA!No.1/2011 is reviewed. Resultantly, ITA No.1/2011.shall stand restored for appropriate consideration inaccordance with law. Review Petition is disposed of. JT/- Sd/-.JUDGE. Sd/-.JU DGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan