Case LawHigh Court › Rp/200/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of In...

Rp/200/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ibm India Pvt Ltd

High Court 31 Mar 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/200/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ibm India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
31 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/200/2022 Of The Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Ibm India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: In the result, the review petition fails and is hereby dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF MARCH, 2023 PRESENT …PETITIONERS …RESPONDENT THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW/RECALL THE ORDER DATED 29/01/2021 PASSED BY THIS HONBLE COURT IN ITA NO.1091/2017. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard on the question of admission. This petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment dated 29.01.2021 passed in ITA No.1091/2017. We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner at length. In our considered opinion, the judgment dated 29.01.2021 neither suffers from any jurisdictional infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the record warranting of this court in exercise of review jurisdiction. In the result, the review petition fails and is hereby dismissed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE SS
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan