Case Law › High Court › Rp/205/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Ta...

Rp/205/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Wipro Ge Medical Systems

High Court 17 Sep 2014 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

17 Sep 2014

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/205/2014 Of Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Wipro Ge Medical Systems, the High Court (2014) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the|review petition and the application filed for condoning thedelay in filing the review petition are dismissed. od/-| JUDGE Yn. sd/-.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BANGALORE DATED THIS THE 17[TH|]DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014 *-~PRESENT THE HON'BLE Mr.JUSTICE N.KUMAR AND THE HON'BLE Mrs.JUSTICE RATHNAKALA RP No.205/2014INITA NO.925/2007 BETWEEN 1.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE -560 OO] «|THERE DEPUTLY COMMISSIONER OINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3)_C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROADINCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3)_C.R.BUILDING, QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE -560 OO] (BY SRI SANMATHI E.I., ADVOCATE) ANT _.. PETITIONERS| M/S WIPRO GE MEDICAL SYSTEMSPVT. LTD., PLOT NO.o-KADUGODI INDUSTRIAL AREA)BANGALORBE-560 067. RESPONDENT THIS RP IS FILED UNDER ORDER 4/7 RULE 1 OF CPC, |TO REVIEKW THRE ORDER DAIEBED 17.12.2013 PASSED IN NO.925/2007ANDRESTORETHE;APPEALOF.PRTITIONBR-APPELLANTTO|BE.HRARI)INDBPBNDBNTLY |AFRESH ON THE FILE OF THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,BANGALORE. ‘TH KB | THISR.P.COMINGON|KOR.ORDERSTHIS DAY,N.ARUMAR, J.MADEB THR FOLLOWING: ORDER This review petition is filed to review the orderpassed by this Court on 17[3+]December 2013, in ITANo.925/2007. The said appeal came to be dismissed|following an earlier judgment of this Court. In those|circumstances, the question of reviewing the order dated17[3+]December 2013 does not arise. Accordingly, the|review petition and the application filed for condoning thedelay in filing the review petition are dismissed. od/-| JUDGE Yn. sd/-. JUDGE.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.