Case LawHigh Court › Rp/226/2022 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Incom...

Rp/226/2022 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S Stanley Black And Decker India Ltd

High Court 28 Jun 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/226/2022 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S Stanley Black And Decker India Ltd
Date of order
28 Jun 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Rp/226/2022 Of Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax-Vi v. M/S Stanley Black And Decker India Ltd, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Accordingly, the review petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitally signedby SHAKAMBARILocation: HIGHCOURT OFKARNATAKA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28 DAY OF JUNE, 2024 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD AND THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMACHANDRA D. HUDDAR REVIEW PETITION NO. 226 OF 2022 BETWEEN: 1. PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-VI BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE. BMTC COMPLEX, KORAMANGALA BANGALORE. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE - 6 (1) (2), BENGALURU. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANMATHI E I.,ADVOCATE) AND: M/S STANLEY BLACK AND DECKER INDIA LTD NO.28, AKEPMS 3RD MAIN 1ST CROSS, ASHWINI LAYOUT KORMANGALA, INTERMEDIATE RING ROAD BENGALURU - 47 PAN. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. TANMAYEE RAJKUMAR.,ADVOCATE) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER 47 RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE JUDGMENT DATED 14/10/2020 PASSED IN ITA NO. 526/2016. THIS REVIEW PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, H.T.NARENDARA PRASAD J, MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER This petition is filed seeking review of the judgment dated 14.10.2020 passed in ITA No.526/2016, whereby the appeal preferred by the revenue was dismissed in view of Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes on the ground that the tax effect involved in the appeal is less than Rs.1 Crore. However, liberty was reserved to the petitioner herein to revive the appeal in case the matter falls within the exceptions of the Circular dated 08.08.2019. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the tax effect is more than Rs.1 Crore and sought for recalling the order. 3. Heard the learned counsel for the parties and perused the petition papers. 4. In view of the submission made above, the order dated 14.10.2020 passed in ITA No.526/2016 is recalled. The ITA No.526/2016 is restored to file. 5. Accordingly, the review petition is allowed. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE CM List No.: 1 Sl No.: 3
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan