Rp/230/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
High Court
21 Mar 2016 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · highcourtofkerala
Parties
Rp/230/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)
Date of order
21 Mar 2016
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/230/2016 Of The Kidangoor Service Co-Operative Bank Ltd v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), the High Court (2016) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
MONDAY, THE 21ST DAY OF MARCH 2016/1ST CHAITHRA, 1938
RP.No. 230 of 2016 (E) IN WP(C).6043/2016
-------------------------------------------
WP(C) 6043/2016 of THIS HON'BLE COURT
------------
REVIEW PETITIONER/PETITIONER IN WPC :
------------------------------------------------------------
THE KIDANGOOR SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.NO.3431 KIDANGOOR P.O., KIDANGOOR, KOTTAYAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.
BY ADV. SRI.O.D.SIVADAS
RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS :---------------------------------------------
1. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM-686 001. AYAKAR BHAVAN, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
2. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER
WARD 5, KOTTAYAM-686 001.
BY SRI.JOSE JOSEPH, SC, FOR INCOME TAX
THIS REVIEW PETITION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 21-03-2016, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J.
===========================================
R.P. No. 230 of 2016inW.P.(C). No. 6043 of 2016=====================================================Dated this the 21[st] day of March, 2016
JUDGMENT
On going through the review petition, I do not find any reasonto review the judgment dated 17.02.2016 in WP(C) No.6043 of2016. The review petition therefore fails and is accordinglydismissed. Taking note of the submission of counsel for thepetitioner that he will file an appeal before the appellate authoritywithin a week, the stay against recovery steps that was granted inthe judgment referred to above, shall stand extended upto30.03.2016.
sd/-A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.