Rp/240/2023 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Eit Services India Pvt Ltd
High Court
26 Jun 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/240/2023 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Eit Services India Pvt Ltd
Date of order
26 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Rp/240/2023 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Eit Services India Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Resultantly, the review petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitally signed byANUSHA VLocation: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA
NC: 2023:KHC:21938
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26 DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE P.S.DINESH KUMAR
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.G. SHIVASHANKARE GOWDA
REVIEW PETITION NO. 240 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX 5 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD KORAMANGALA BENGALURU-560 095
2. THE ASST. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1)(2) 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -2(1)(2) 2 FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING 80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA
BENGALURU-560095 …PETITIONERS
(BY SHRI. M. DILIP, STANDING COUNSEL)
AND:
M/s. EIT SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS HEWLETT PACKARD, GLOBAL SOFT PVT LTD.,) (IN THE CASE OF ERSTWHILE RELQ SOFTWARE PVT. LTD.,) PLOT NO.39/40, ELECTRONICS CITY PHASE II, HOSUR ROAD BANGALORE-560 100 PAN:AAACR 9468C …RESPONDENT
THE REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII, RULE 1 R/W SECTION 114 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW/RECALL THE ORDER DATED 12.12.2022 PASSED BY THIS HON’BLE COURT IN ITA NO. 875/2018 AND TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS
AS THIS HON’BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS REVIEW PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, P.S.DINESH KUMAR, J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard Shri M.Dilip, learned standing counsel for the Revenue.
2. This review petition is filed belatedly after 87 days. No ground is made out to interfere with impugned order. Resultantly, the review petition stands dismissed. Consequently, I.A.No.1/2023 also stands disposed of.
No costs.
Sd/- JUDGE
Sd/- JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.