Rp/258/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Honeywell Technology
High Court
10 Jan 2020 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/258/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Honeywell Technology
Date of order
10 Jan 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/258/2018 Of The Pr.commissioner Of Income-Tax v. M/S Honeywell Technology, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, review petition stands dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THR HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATBD THIS THER 1 DAY OF JANUARY, 2020
BEFORE:
THR HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S. SUJATHA
ANT)
THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B.A. PATIL |
REVIEW PETITION No.258/2018IN ITA No.378/2013
BETWEEN :
1.THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX.
FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING
80 FEET ROAD, 6[‘T]BLOCK
KORAMANGALA, BANGALORE-5S60095.
oD THER DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOMBE-TA
CIRCLE-11/4], PRESENT ADDRESS
DCIT, CIRCLE-3/1]/2], 2 KLOOR.
BMTC BUILDING, 80 FEET ROAD
"[‘T]BLOCK, KORAMANGALA|
BENGALURU-560095..
~.. PHLTITIONERS
(BY SRI DILIP, ADV. FOR SRI ARAVIND.K.V., ADV.)
AND :
M/s. HONEYWELL TECHNOLOGYSOLUTIONS LAB PVT. LTD.,No.151/1, DORAISARIPALYA BANNBRGHATIA ROAD.BENGALURU-560076..
.. RESPONDENT.
THIS REBEVIBW PHRTITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW THE ORDER DATED|
11.07.2018 PASSED IN ITA No.378/2013, ON THE FILE OF THEH ON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, |S. SUJATHAJ., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners.Having considered the arguments advanced by thelearned counsel for the petitioners and perusing thematerial on record, we are of the considered view that)no error apparent on the face of the record is made outto review the order as sought for.
Hence, review petition stands dismissed.
Dvr:
Sd/-)JUDGE
Sd/-)JUDGE|
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue