Case Law › High Court › Rp/281/2022 Of The Assistant Commissione...

Rp/281/2022 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. V S Chandrashekar

High Court 31 Mar 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

31 Mar 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Rp/281/2022 Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax v. V S Chandrashekar, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER In view of the modification of the judgment dated 02.02.2021 passed in ITA No.70/15, this review petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 31 DAY OF MARCH 2023 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE AND THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJ REVIEW PETITION NO.281 OF 2022 BETWEEN: (BY SRI. SHARATH S, ADV.,) THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XXXXVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW/CALL THE ORDER DATED 02.02.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT IN ITA NO.70/2015. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRATNED IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCE OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUTICE AND EQUITY. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER In view of the modification of the judgment dated 02.02.2021 passed in ITA No.70/15, this review petition is disposed of. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- JUDGE SS

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.