Rp/299/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canara Bank
High Court
20 Jan 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · karnataka_bng_old
Parties
Rp/299/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canara Bank
Date of order
20 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Rp/299/2022 Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Canara Bank, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: In the result, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Digitally signedby RUPA VLocation: HighCourt ofKarnataka
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURUDATED THIS THE 20 DAY OF JANUARY 2023|PRESENT|THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHEANDTHE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R. NATARAJI|REVIEW PETITION NO.299 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.THR COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAXLIU, 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA.BBRENGALURU - 560 O952 |THR JOINT COMMISSIONBR OF INCOME-TAXLTU, 7TH FLOOR, BMTC BUILDING.80 FEET ROAD, KORAMANGALA.BBRENGALURU - 560 O95_. PETITIONER
(BY SRI. ARAVIND K V, ADV..,)
AND:1.|M/S. CANARA BANK|BSCA SBCTIONHEBKAD OFFICE 11JC ROAD, BENGALURU-5S60002PAN-AAACCO61060G
. RESPONDENT
THIS REVIBW PRTITION IS FILED UNDEBR ORDERXXXXVII RULE 1 OF CPC, PRAYING TO REVIEW/RECALL THEORDER DATED 30.6.2021 PASSED BY THIS HON'BLE COURT INITA NO.267/2018. TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERSAS THIS HON'BLE COURT DEEMS FIT TO BE GRANTED IN THE
FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THR CASH IN THR INTBRESTOF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.|
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,|ALOK ARADHE J.,MADE THE FOLLOWING: .
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking review of the judgment|dated 30.06.2021 passed in I.T.A.No.267/2018.
After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner, we find thatthe judgment neither suffers from any error apparent on the faceof the record nor any jurisdictional infirmity warrantinginterference of this court in exercise of review jurisdiction.
In the result, the petition fails and is hereby dismissed.
Sd/-.
JUDGE
Sd/-.
JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue