Case Law › High Court › Rp/30/2013 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v....

Rp/30/2013 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Cheslind Textiles Ltd

High Court 09 Jan 2015 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · karnataka_bng_old

Parties

Date of order

09 Jan 2015

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Rp/30/2013 Of The Commr Of Income Tax v. M/S Cheslind Textiles Ltd, the High Court (2015) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENGALURU DATED THIS THE Q DAY OF JANUARY 2015) PRESENT THR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE N.KUMAR ANT) THR HON’BLE MR.JUSTICKH B.MANOHAR REVIEW PETITION No.30 OF 2013IN ITA No. 1405 OF 200 BETWEEN : 1.THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX| C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE —- 560 OO] 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX BANGALORE —- 1, C.R.BUILDING QUEENS ROAD BANGALORE .. PETITIONERS (BY SRI.KAMALADHAR, ADVOCATE) AND : M/S.CHESLIND TEXTILES LTD.,NO.40, LOOFT. ROAD|IV BLOCK, KORAMANGALA|BANGALORE — 560 034 —. RESPONDENT (BY SRI.S.PARTHASARATHY, ADVOCATE) THIS REVIEW PHRTITION [IS FILED UNDER SBKBCT260A OF THE INCOME TAX ACT R/W SEC.114 OF CPC,PRAYING FOR REVIEW THRE ORDER DATED 3-9-2012PASSED IN ITA No.1405/2006, ON THE FILE OF THE)HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BANGALORE. THIS RBEVIBW PRTITION COMING ON FOR ORDERSTHIS DAY,N.KUMAR J., MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER Heard the learned counsel for the parties. We do not see any merit in the review petition.|Hence,petition1S|dismissed. Consequently, ].A.No.1/2013, tiled for condoning the delay is also|0:7<:77-0. SD/- JUDGE SD/-) JUDGE

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.